All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

From Isolation to Concentration: The Archeology of the Relationship between Russian Formalism and Czech Structuralism in Polemics and Discussions

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15410%2F17%3A73586850" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15410/17:73586850 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    From Isolation to Concentration: The Archeology of the Relationship between Russian Formalism and Czech Structuralism in Polemics and Discussions

  • Original language description

    The history of Czech Structuralism is full of various polemics that were often significantly contributed to the development of structural thinking. It is not just about mutual polemical clashes, but about the way in which the various debates were held, or about a particular strategy which can often be reconstructed based on different types of texts. What can we meaningfully imagine when the concept of the strategy of thinking is used? In other words, is it possible to detect and analyze, referring to the quoted Mukařovský’s passage, some general patterns, which govern the area of scientific inquiry? If we ask such questions, we can add one more: it is possible to construct a historical analysis of scientific opinion or a current theoretical research rather than as (i) the development of ideas and knowledge related to the specific areas of human activity or (ii) the historical stage in the development of a certain type of Sciences (humanities, literary), but as the description and analysis of a historical space, within which the ideas, knowledge are still in the making? In this sense, it is not a description of the findings in terms of their development to the objectivity, but the history of the terms of their ability to appear and operate within a particular field of thought. It is clear that the results of such historical analysis, defined as archeology, cannot be integrated into a complex interpretation of Czech Literary Structuralism and its development.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60205 - Literary theory

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2017

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    Epokha ostraneniia: Russkii formalizm i sovremennoe gumanitarnoe znanie

  • ISBN

    978-5-4448-0629-6

  • Number of pages of the result

    11

  • Pages from-to

    165-175

  • Number of pages of the book

    672

  • Publisher name

    Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie

  • Place of publication

    Moscow

  • UT code for WoS chapter