All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Simulation of spring barley yield in different climatic zones of Northern and Central Europe: A comparison of nine crop models

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43210%2F12%3A00189010" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43210/12:00189010 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/67179843:_____/12:00384072

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.03.016" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.03.016</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.03.016" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.fcr.2012.03.016</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Simulation of spring barley yield in different climatic zones of Northern and Central Europe: A comparison of nine crop models

  • Original language description

    In this study, the performance of nine widely used and accessible crop growth simulation models (APES-ACE, CROPSYST, DAISY, DSSAT-CERES, FASSET, HERMES, MONICA, STICS and WOFOST) was compared during 44 growing seasons of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) at seven sites in Northern and Central Europe. The aims of this model comparison were to examine how different process-based crop models perform at multiple sites across Europe when applied with minimal information for model calibration of spring barley at field scale, whether individual models perform better than the multi-model mean, and what the uncertainty ranges are in simulated grain yields. The reasons for differences among the models and how results for barley compare to winter wheat are discussed. Regarding yield estimation, best performing based on the root mean square error (RMSE) were models HERMES, MONICA and WOFOST with lowest values of 1124, 1282 and 1325 (kg ha1), respectively. Applying the index of agreement (IA), mod

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    GC - Plant growing, crop rotation

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

    Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2012

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Field Crops Research

  • ISSN

    0378-4290

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    133

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    14

  • Pages from-to

    23-36

  • UT code for WoS article

    305497300003

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database