All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Estimating the water use efficiency of spring barley using crop models

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43210%2F18%3A43913233" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43210/18:43913233 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/86652079:_____/18:00495404

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859618000060" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859618000060</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859618000060" target="_blank" >10.1017/S0021859618000060</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Estimating the water use efficiency of spring barley using crop models

  • Original language description

    In the current study, simulations by five crop models (WOFOST, CERES-Barley, HERMES, DAISY and AQUACROP) were compared for 7-12 growing seasons of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) at three sites in the Czech Republic. The aims were to compare how various process-based crop models with different calculation approaches simulate different values of transpiration (Ta) and evapotranspiration (ET) based on the same input data and compare the outputs of these simulations with reference data. From the outputs of each model, the water use efficiency (WUE) from Ta (WUETa) and from actual ET (WUEETa) was calculated for grain yields and above-ground biomass yield. The results of the first part of the study show that the model with the Penman approach for calculating ET simulates lower actual ET (ETa) sums, at an average of 250 mm during the growing season, than other models, which use the Penman-Monteith approach and simulate 330 mm on average during the growing season. In the second part of the current study, WUE reference values in the range 1.9-2.4 kg/m3 were calculated for spring barley and grain yield. Values of WUETa/WUEETa calculated from the outputs of individual models for grain yields and above-ground biomass yields ranged from 2.0/1.0 to 5.9/3.8 kg/m3 with an average value of 3.2/2.0 kg/m3 and from 3.9/2.1 to 10.5/6.8 kg/m3 with an average value of 6.5/4.0 kg/m3, respectively. The results confirm that the average values of all models are nearest to actual values.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10510 - Climatic research

Result continuities

  • Project

    Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2018

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of Agricultural Science

  • ISSN

    0021-8596

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    156

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    5

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    17

  • Pages from-to

    628-644

  • UT code for WoS article

    000458503500005

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85060186237