All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of Immunofluorescence Method with Histochemical and ELISA Methods Focusing on Wheat Protein Detection in Meat Products

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62157124%3A16270%2F17%3A43874683" target="_blank" >RIV/62157124:16270/17:43874683 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09540105.2017.1328661" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1080/09540105.2017.1328661</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540105.2017.1328661" target="_blank" >10.1080/09540105.2017.1328661</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of Immunofluorescence Method with Histochemical and ELISA Methods Focusing on Wheat Protein Detection in Meat Products

  • Original language description

    Gliadin is a major allergen causing allergies occurring also in meat products. Since wheat protein is used as a meat substitute to reduce cost of meat products. Sensitive consumers of these products are really threatened by food allergies in different allergic reaction. The objective of the study was to compare the histochemical, immunochemical (ALERT gliadin screening test) and immunofluorescence methods for the detection of wheat protein in model meat samples and meat products. The limit of detection (LOD) for the ALERT gliadin screening test was 10*104 mg.kg-1 of addition, while the histochemical method demonstrated concentration of wheat protein already from 10*103 mg.kg-1, and the immunofluorescence method from the concentration of 20 mg.kg-1. Comparison of the methods using McNemar?s test shows a statistically highly significant difference (p = 0.01) between the immunofluorescence method and ELISA and a statistically highly significant difference (p = 0.01) between the immunofluorescence and histochemical methods.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    40500 - Other agricultural sciences

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2017

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Food and Agricultural Immunology

  • ISSN

    0954-0105

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    28

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    6

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

    1094-1104

  • UT code for WoS article

    000410806400014

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database