Goodness-Fixing Isn't Good Enough: A Reply to McHugh and Way

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F19%3A50017050" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/19:50017050 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://academic.oup.com/mind/article-abstract/128/512/1309/5090539?redirectedFrom=fulltext" target="_blank" >https://academic.oup.com/mind/article-abstract/128/512/1309/5090539?redirectedFrom=fulltext</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzy035" target="_blank" >10.1093/mind/fzy035</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Goodness-Fixing Isn't Good Enough: A Reply to McHugh and Way
Original language description
According to McHugh and Way, reasoning is a person-level attitude revision that is regulated by its constitutive aim of getting fitting attitudes. They claim that this account offers an explanation of what is wrong with reasoning in ways one believes to be bad, and that this explanation is an alternative to an explanation that appeals to the so-called Taking Condition. I argue that their explanation is unsatisfying.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)