The relationship between gadolinium enhancement and [18 F]fluorothymidine uptake in brain lesions with the use of hybrid PET/MRI
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F65269705%3A_____%2F24%3A00080333" target="_blank" >RIV/65269705:_____/24:00080333 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216224:14110/24:00138513
Result on the web
<a href="https://cancerimagingjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40644-024-00761-0" target="_blank" >https://cancerimagingjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40644-024-00761-0</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00761-0" target="_blank" >10.1186/s40644-024-00761-0</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
The relationship between gadolinium enhancement and [18 F]fluorothymidine uptake in brain lesions with the use of hybrid PET/MRI
Original language description
Background To evaluate and compare the diagnostic power of [F-18]FLT-PET with ceMRI in patients with brain tumours or other focal lesions. Methods 121 patients with suspected brain tumour or those after brain tumour surgery were enroled in this retrospective study (61 females, 60 males, mean age 37.3 years, range 1-80 years). All patients underwent [F-18]FLT-PET/MRI with gadolinium contrast agent application. In 118 of these patients, a final diagnosis was made, verified by histopathology or by follow-up. Agreement between ceMRI and [F-18]FLT-PET of the whole study group was established. Further, sensitivity and specificity of ceMRI and [F-18]FLT-PET were calculated for differentiation of high-grade vs. low-grade tumours, high-grade vs. low-grade tumours together with non-tumour lesions and for differentiation of high-grade tumours from all other verified lesions. Results [F-18]FLT-PET and ceMRI findings were concordant in 119 cases (98%). On closer analysis of a subset of 64 patients with verified gliomas, the sensitivity and specificity of both PET and ceMRI were identical (90% and 84%, respectively) for differentiating low-grade from high-grade tumours, if the contrast enhancement and [F-18]FLT uptake were considered as hallmarks of high-grade tumour. For differentiation of high-grade tumours from low-grade tumours and lesions of nontumorous aetiology (e.g., inflammatory lesions or post-therapeutic changes) in a subgroup of 93 patients by visual evaluation, the sensitivity of both PET and ceMRI was 90%, whereas the specificity of PET was slightly higher (61%) compared to ceMRI (57%). By receiver operating characteristic analysis, the sensitivity and specificity were 82% and 74%, respectively, when the threshold of SUVmax in the tumour was set to 0.9 g/ml. Conclusion We demonstrated a generally very high correlation of [F-18]FLT accumulation with contrast enhancement visible on ceMRI and a comparable diagnostic yield in both modalities for differentiating high-grade tumours from low-grade tumours and lesions of other aetiology.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30224 - Radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Cancer Imaging
ISSN
1740-5025
e-ISSN
1470-7330
Volume of the periodical
24
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
9
Pages from-to
110
UT code for WoS article
001294131700001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85201539804