On M-stationarity conditions in MPECs and the associated qualification conditions
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985556%3A_____%2F18%3A00474227" target="_blank" >RIV/67985556:_____/18:00474227 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10107-017-1146-3" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10107-017-1146-3</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10107-017-1146-3" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10107-017-1146-3</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
On M-stationarity conditions in MPECs and the associated qualification conditions
Original language description
Depending on whether a mathematical program with equilibrium constraints (MPEC) is considered in its original or its enhanced (via KKT conditions) form, the assumed qualification conditions as well as the derived necessary optimality conditions may differ significantly. In this paper, we study this issue when imposing one of the weakest possible qualification conditions, namely the calmness of the perturbation mapping associated with the respective generalized equations in both forms of the MPEC. It is well known that the calmness property allows one to derive the so-called M-stationarity conditions. The restrictiveness of assumptions and the strength of conclusions in the two forms of theMPECis also strongly related to the qualification conditions on the “lower level”. For instance, even under the linear independence constraint qualification (LICQ) for a lower level feasible set described by C^1 functions, the calmness properties of the original and the enhanced perturbation mapping are drastically different. When passing to C^{1,1} data, this difference still remains true under the weaker Mangasarian–Fromovitz constraint qualification, whereas under LICQ both the calmness assumption and the derived optimality conditions are fully equivalent for the original and the enhanced form of the MPEC. After clarifying these relations, we provide a compilation of practically relevant consequences of our analysis in the derivation of necessary optimality conditions. The obtained results are finally applied to MPECs with structured equilibria.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10101 - Pure mathematics
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA15-00735S" target="_blank" >GA15-00735S: Stability analysis of optima and equilibria in economics</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Mathematical Programming
ISSN
0025-5610
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
168
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1-2
Country of publishing house
NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS
Number of pages
31
Pages from-to
229-259
UT code for WoS article
000426071000010
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85017593151