Comparison of Six Methods for the Detection of Causality in a Bivariate Time Series
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985807%3A_____%2F18%3A00489765" target="_blank" >RIV/67985807:_____/18:00489765 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://journals.aps.org/pre/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.042207" target="_blank" >https://journals.aps.org/pre/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.042207</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.042207" target="_blank" >10.1103/PhysRevE.97.042207</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Comparison of Six Methods for the Detection of Causality in a Bivariate Time Series
Original language description
In this comparative study, six causality detection methods were compared, namely, the Granger vector autoregressive test, the extended Granger test, the kernel version of the Granger test, the conditional mutual information (transfer entropy), the evaluation of cross mappings between state spaces, and an assessment of predictability improvement due to the use of mixed predictions. Seven test data sets were analyzed: linear coupling of autoregressive models, a unidirectional connection of two Hénon systems, a unidirectional connection of chaotic systems of Rössler and Lorenz type and of two different Rössler systems, an example of bidirectionally connected two-species systems, a fishery model as an example of two correlated observables without a causal relationship, and an example of mediated causality. We tested not only 20 000 points long clean time series but also noisy and short variants of the data. The standard and the extended Granger tests worked only for the autoregressive models. The remaining methods were more successful with the more complex test examples, although they differed considerably in their capability to reveal the presence and the direction of coupling and to distinguish causality from mere correlation.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/NV15-33250A" target="_blank" >NV15-33250A: Prediction of therapeutic response in patients with depressive disorder by means of new methods of EEG analysis.</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Physical Review E
ISSN
2470-0045
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
97
Issue of the periodical within the volume
4
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
14
Pages from-to
—
UT code for WoS article
000429526600003
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85045395761