Evaluation of blood-brain barrier integrity by the analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI – a comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative methods.
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985823%3A_____%2F22%3A00567451" target="_blank" >RIV/67985823:_____/22:00567451 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11130/22:10455097 RIV/00064203:_____/22:10455097
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.biomed.cas.cz/physiolres/pdf/2022/71_S259.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.biomed.cas.cz/physiolres/pdf/2022/71_S259.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.33549/physiolres.934998" target="_blank" >10.33549/physiolres.934998</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Evaluation of blood-brain barrier integrity by the analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI – a comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative methods.
Original language description
Disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a key feature of various brain disorders. To assess its integrity a parametrization of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI) with a contrast agent (CA) is broadly used. Parametrization can be done quantitatively or semi-quantitatively. Quantitative methods directly describe BBB permeability but exhibit several drawbacks such as high computation demands, reproducibility issues, or low robustness. Semi-quantitative methods are fast to compute, simply mathematically described, and robust, however, they do not describe the status of BBB directly but only as a variation of CA concentration in measured tissue. Our goal was to elucidate differences between five semi-quantitative parameters: maximal intensity (Imax), normalized permeability index (NPI), and difference in DCE values between three timepoints: baseline, 5 min, and 15 min (delta5-0, delta15-0, delta15-5) and two quantitative parameters: transfer constant (Ktrans) and an extravascular fraction (Ve). For the purpose of comparison, we analyzed DCE data of four patients 12-15 days after the stroke with visible CA enhancement. Calculated parameters showed abnormalities spatially corresponding with the ischemic lesion, however, findings in individual parameters morphometrically differed. Ktrans and Ve were highly correlated. Delta5-0 and delta15-0 were prominent in regions with rapid CA enhancement and highly correlated with Ktrans. Abnormalities in delta15-5 and NPI were more homogenous with less variable values, smoother borders, and less detail than Ktrans. Moreover, only delta15-5 and NPI were able to distinguish vessels from extravascular space. Our comparison provides important knowledge for understanding and interpreting parameters derived from DCE MRI by both quantitative and semi-quantitative methods.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30103 - Neurosciences (including psychophysiology)
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Physiological Research
ISSN
0862-8408
e-ISSN
1802-9973
Volume of the periodical
71
Issue of the periodical within the volume
Suppl. 2
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
17
Pages from-to
"S259"-"s275"
UT code for WoS article
000924861700011
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85146336279