All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

DRAT proofs, propagation redundancy, and extended resolution

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985840%3A_____%2F19%3A00507739" target="_blank" >RIV/67985840:_____/19:00507739 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24258-9_5" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24258-9_5</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24258-9_5" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-030-24258-9_5</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    DRAT proofs, propagation redundancy, and extended resolution

  • Original language description

    We study the proof complexity of RAT proofs and related systems including BC, SPR, and PR which use blocked clauses and (subset) propagation redundancy. These systems arise in satisfiability (SAT) solving, and allow inferences which preserve satisfiability but not logical implication. We introduce a new inference SR using substitution redundancy. We consider systems both with and without deletion. With new variables allowed, the systems are known to have the same proof theoretic strength as extended resolution. We focus on the systems that do not allow new variables to be introduced. Our first main result is that the systems DRAT $${}^-$$, DSPR $${}^-$$ and DPR $${}^-$$, which allow deletion but not new variables, are polynomially equivalent. By earlier work of Kiesl, Rebola-Pardo and Heule, they are also equivalent to DBC $${}^-$$. Without deletion and without new variables, we show that SPR $${}^-$$ can polynomially simulate PR $${}^-$$ provided only short clauses are inferred by SPR inferences. Our next main results are that many of the well-known “hard” principles have polynomial size SPR $${}^-$$ refutations (without deletions or new variables). These include the pigeonhole principle, bit pigeonhole principle, parity principle, Tseitin tautologies, and clique-coloring tautologies, SPR $${}^-$$ can also handle or-fication and xor-ification. Our final result is an exponential size lower bound for RAT $${}^-$$ refutations, giving exponential separations between RAT $${}^-$$ and both DRAT $${}^-$$ and SPR $${}^-$$.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA19-05497S" target="_blank" >GA19-05497S: Complexity of mathematical proofs and structures</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2019

  • ISBN

    978-3-030-24257-2

  • ISSN

    0302-9743

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    19

  • Pages from-to

    71-89

  • Publisher name

    Springer

  • Place of publication

    Cham

  • Event location

    Lisbon

  • Event date

    Jul 9, 2019

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article