Intercomparison of 15 Aerodynamic Particle Size Spectrometers (APS 3321): Uncertainties in Particle Sizing and Number Size Distribution.
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985858%3A_____%2F16%3A00458521" target="_blank" >RIV/67985858:_____/16:00458521 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1545-2016" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1545-2016</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1545-2016" target="_blank" >10.5194/amt-9-1545-2016</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Intercomparison of 15 Aerodynamic Particle Size Spectrometers (APS 3321): Uncertainties in Particle Sizing and Number Size Distribution.
Original language description
In a laboratory study within the framework of ACTRIS, 15 aerodynamic particle size spectrometers (APS model 3321, TSI Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) were compared with a focus on flow rates, particle sizing, and the unit-tounit variability of the particle number size distribution. Flow rate deviations were relatively small (within a few percent), while the sizing accuracy was found to be within 10% compared to polystyrene latex (PSL) reference particles. The unit-to-unit variability in terms of the particle number size distribution during this study was within 10% to 20% for particles in the range of 0.9 up to 3 μm, which is acceptable for atmospheric measurements. For particles smaller than that, the variability increased up to 60 %, probably caused by differences in the counting efficiencies ofnindividual units. Number size distribution data for particles smaller than 0.9 μm in aerodynamic diameter should only be used with caution. For particles larger than 3 μm, the unit-tounit variability increased as well. A possible reason is an insufficient sizing accuracy in combination with a steeply sloping particle number size distribution and the increasing uncertainty due to decreasing counting. Particularly this uncertainty of the particle number size distribution must be considered if higher moments of the size distribution such as the particle volume or mass are calculated, which require thenconversion of the aerodynamic diameter measured to a volume equivalent diameter. In order to perform a quantitative quality assurance, a traceable reference method for the particle number concentration in the size range 0.5–3 μm is needed.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
CF - Physical chemistry and theoretical chemistry
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
ISSN
1867-1381
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
9
Issue of the periodical within the volume
4
Country of publishing house
DE - GERMANY
Number of pages
7
Pages from-to
1545-1551
UT code for WoS article
000375616100009
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-84964777724