All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Intercomparison of 15 Aerodynamic Particle Size Spectrometers (APS 3321): Uncertainties in Particle Sizing and Number Size Distribution.

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985858%3A_____%2F16%3A00458521" target="_blank" >RIV/67985858:_____/16:00458521 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1545-2016" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1545-2016</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1545-2016" target="_blank" >10.5194/amt-9-1545-2016</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Intercomparison of 15 Aerodynamic Particle Size Spectrometers (APS 3321): Uncertainties in Particle Sizing and Number Size Distribution.

  • Original language description

    In a laboratory study within the framework of ACTRIS, 15 aerodynamic particle size spectrometers (APS model 3321, TSI Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) were compared with a focus on flow rates, particle sizing, and the unit-tounit variability of the particle number size distribution. Flow rate deviations were relatively small (within a few percent), while the sizing accuracy was found to be within 10% compared to polystyrene latex (PSL) reference particles. The unit-to-unit variability in terms of the particle number size distribution during this study was within 10% to 20% for particles in the range of 0.9 up to 3 μm, which is acceptable for atmospheric measurements. For particles smaller than that, the variability increased up to 60 %, probably caused by differences in the counting efficiencies ofnindividual units. Number size distribution data for particles smaller than 0.9 μm in aerodynamic diameter should only be used with caution. For particles larger than 3 μm, the unit-tounit variability increased as well. A possible reason is an insufficient sizing accuracy in combination with a steeply sloping particle number size distribution and the increasing uncertainty due to decreasing counting. Particularly this uncertainty of the particle number size distribution must be considered if higher moments of the size distribution such as the particle volume or mass are calculated, which require thenconversion of the aerodynamic diameter measured to a volume equivalent diameter. In order to perform a quantitative quality assurance, a traceable reference method for the particle number concentration in the size range 0.5–3 μm is needed.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    CF - Physical chemistry and theoretical chemistry

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

  • ISSN

    1867-1381

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    9

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    DE - GERMANY

  • Number of pages

    7

  • Pages from-to

    1545-1551

  • UT code for WoS article

    000375616100009

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-84964777724