Disregarding population specificity: its influence on the sex assessment methods from the tibia
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985912%3A_____%2F17%3A00462670" target="_blank" >RIV/67985912:_____/17:00462670 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11310/17:10333760 RIV/00216208:11320/17:10333760
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1413-5" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1413-5</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1413-5" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00414-016-1413-5</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Disregarding population specificity: its influence on the sex assessment methods from the tibia
Original language description
Forensic anthropology has developed classification techniques for sex estimation of unknown skeletal remains, for example population-specific discriminant function analyses. These methods were designed for populations that lived mostly in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Their level of reliability or misclassification is important for practical use in today's forensic practice, it is, however, unknown. We addressed the question of what the likelihood of errors would be if population specificity of discriminant functions of the tibia were disregarded. Moreover, five classification functions in a Czech sample were proposed (accuracies 82.1-87.5 %, sex bias ranged from -1.3 to -5.4 %). We measured ten variables traditionally used for sex assessment of the tibia on a sample of 30 male and 26 female models from recent Czech population. To estimate the classification accuracy and error (misclassification) rates ignoring population specificity, we selected published classification functions of tibia for the Portuguese, south European, and the North American populations. These functions were applied on the dimensions of the Czech population. Comparing the classification success of the reference and the tested Czech sample showed that females from Czech population were significantly overestimated and mostly misclassified as males. Overall accuracy of sex assessment significantly decreased (53.6-69.7 %), sex bias -29.4-100 %, which is most probably caused by secular trend and the generally high variability of body size. Results indicate that the discriminant functions, developed for skeletal series representing geographically and chronologically diverse populations, are not applicable in current forensic investigations. Finally, implications and recommendations for future research are discussed.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60102 - Archaeology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2017
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
International Journal of Legal Medicine
ISSN
0937-9827
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
131
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
11
Pages from-to
251-261
UT code for WoS article
000391371500032
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-84979210746