All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Late Scholastic Analyses of Inductive Reasoning

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F20%3A00532254" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/20:00532254 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.5840/studneoar20201712" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.5840/studneoar20201712</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/studneoar20201712" target="_blank" >10.5840/studneoar20201712</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Late Scholastic Analyses of Inductive Reasoning

  • Original language description

    The late scholastic era was, among others, contemporary to the “emergence of probability”, the German academic philosophy from Leibniz to Kant, and the introduction of Newtonian physics. Within this era, two branches of the late-scholastic analysis of induction can be identified, one which can be thought of as a continual development of earlier scholastic approaches, while the other one absorbed influences of early modern philosophy, mathematics, and physics. Both branches of scholastic philosophy share the terminology of modalities, probability, and forms of (inductive) arguments. Furthermore, induction was commonly considered valid as a result of being a covert syllogism. Last but not least, there appears to be a difference in emphasis between the two traditions’ analyses of induction: while Tolomei discussed the theological presuppositions of induction, Amort’s “leges contingentium” exemplify the principles of induction by aleatory phenomena and Boscovich’s rules for inductive arguments are predominately concerned with the generalisation of macro-level observations to the micro-level.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/GA17-12408S" target="_blank" >GA17-12408S: Probabilistic reasoning in late scholastic logic</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Studia Neoaristotelica

  • ISSN

    1214-8407

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    17

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    32

  • Pages from-to

    35-66

  • UT code for WoS article

    000619558700002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85096331835