Lingua characterica and calculus ratiocinator: The Leibnizian background of the Frege-Schröder polemic
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F21%3A00544080" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/21:00544080 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S175502031900025X" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1017/S175502031900025X</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S175502031900025X" target="_blank" >10.1017/S175502031900025X</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Lingua characterica and calculus ratiocinator: The Leibnizian background of the Frege-Schröder polemic
Original language description
After the publication of Begriffsschrift, a conflict erupted between Frege and Schröder regarding their respective logical systems which emerged around the Leibnizian notions of lingua characterica and calculus ratiocinator. Both of them claimed their own logic to be a better realisation of Leibniz’s ideal language and considered the rival system a mere calculus ratiocinator. Inspired by this polemic, van Heijenoort (1967b) distinguished two conceptions of logic-logic as language and logic as calculus-and presented them as opposing views, but did not explain Frege’s and Schröder’s conceptions of the fulfilment of Leibniz’s scientific ideal. In this paper I explain the reasons for Frege’s and Schröder’s mutual accusations of having created a mere calculus ratiocinator. On the one hand, Schröder’s construction of the algebra of relatives fits with a project for the reduction of any mathematical concept to the notion of relative. From this stance I argue that he deemed the formal system of Begriffsschrift incapable of such a reduction. On the other hand, first I argue that Frege took Boolean logic to be an abstract logical theory inadequate for the rendering of specific content, then I claim that the language of Begriffsschrift did not constitute a complete lingua characterica by itself, more being seen by Frege as a tool that could be applied to scientific disciplines. Accordingly, I argue that Frege’s project of constructing a lingua characterica was not tied to his later logicist programme.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Review of Symbolic Logic
ISSN
1755-0203
e-ISSN
1755-0211
Volume of the periodical
14
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
36
Pages from-to
411-446
UT code for WoS article
000673319400005
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85091819812