Perfume Production in the Ancient World
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F23%3A00582811" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/23:00582811 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Perfume Production in the Ancient World
Original language description
The topic of this conference is the production of scented materials (“perfumes”) in the ancient world from multiple perspectives: historical, archaeological, natural scientific, artisanal, cultural, religious. The conference’s aim is to challenge traditional, monolithic ideas of ancient perfumery cultures (“Egyptian”, “Mesopotamian”, “Roman”) and explore (a) how ingredients and the methods of using scented materials travelled across cultures, land and time, and (b) how perfumery and the production of scented materials varied within the same culture over place and time. The conference will include papers on scent traditions from much of antiquity, including Aegean, African, Assyrian, Athenian, Ancient Egyptian, Chinese, Christian, Ancient Greek, Islamicate, Mesopotamian, Minoan, Persian, Pompeiian, Ptolemaic Egyptian, Roman and South Arabian. Specific research questions include: Do familiar linguistic, ethnic, and religious categories used to delineate traditions of ancient perfume production and use -“Assyrian,” “Egyptian,” “Greek,” “Arabic,” “Buddhist,” “Christian,” “Chinese,” etc.- accurately distinguish such traditions and cultures? To what extent can we speak of, for example, “Roman” perfumery, or are there rather many “Roman” traditions across different times, regions, and intentions? Are there correlations between the manufacture of scented materials and other goods? How were those correlations categorized and understood, e.g., luxury goods, medical, magical, divine, etc.? Were natural scents compared with, even opposed to, artificial or synthetic ones? Can we demarcate traditions of ancient perfumery by means of trade networks, equipment, manufacturing techniques? Did know-how and theories of perfume production travel along trade networks? Did the introduction of new botanical, animal and mineral goods, like musk, camphor, ambergris, etc., coincide with different production techniques? What do approaches like practical exegesis (or ‘experimental archaeology’) and digital humanities contribute to these questions in a way that might complement traditional ones found in archaeology, archaeometry, philology, classics, history and philosophy? We are excited to explore work on scented materials and manufacturing in traditions beyond Europe and the Mediterranean shores. We also believe this project benefits immensely by engaging practitioners who work in contemporary perfumery, olfactory art, scent and the senses. For this reason, the conference includes scholars, perfumers, artists, and practitioners alike. The output of this conference is a volume provisionally titled, Perfume Production in the Ancient World. Our meeting is the first stage of this process.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
M - Conference organization
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GM21-30494M" target="_blank" >GM21-30494M: Alchemies of Scent. Reconstructing the Practices of Ancient Greco-Egyptian Perfumery: An Experimental Approach to the History of Science</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Event location
Prague
Event country
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Event starting date
—
Event ending date
—
Total number of attendees
37
Foreign attendee count
23
Type of event by attendee nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce