All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Lying as a Language Game? A Game Theory Perspective

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F24%3A00599862" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/24:00599862 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Lying as a Language Game? A Game Theory Perspective

  • Original language description

    Within game theory, there are important experiments on lying that aim to show the extent to which participants are willing to lie given the costs and benefits of such behavior. However, these investigations have so far only unsystematically reflected the debates about lying in the contemporary philosophy of language and epistemology, in which a variety of definitions of lying are at work. Using the experiment in Fischbacher & Follmi-Heusi (2013) as an example, we demonstrate that the use of contemporary philosophy can be advantageous for game theory in reducing one type of ambiguity in these games: ambiguity about what type of lie is actually considered and applied by the participants. We show that players in the experiment could lie in 17 different ways, all of which are described in James Mahon’s list summarizing definitions of lying in contemporary philosophy (Mahon 2016). It remains ambiguous whether the liars made decisions regarding the identical lying language game and whether they accounted for the same disutility of lying. Future experiments could reduce this ambiguity by including elements in the instructions that make it clearer what type of lie the participant considers or applies.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    O - Miscellaneous

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EH22_008%2F0004595" target="_blank" >EH22_008/0004595: Beyond Security: Role of Conflict in Resilience-Building</a><br>

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů