All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Gambler’s fallacy and imperfect best response in legislative bargaining

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985998%3A_____%2F16%3A00472317" target="_blank" >RIV/67985998:_____/16:00472317 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00216208:11640/16:00463349

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.06.008" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.06.008</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.06.008" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.geb.2016.06.008</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Gambler’s fallacy and imperfect best response in legislative bargaining

  • Original language description

    We investigate the implications of imperfect best response—in combination with different assumptions about correct (QRE) or incorrect beliefs (Quantal-Gambler's Fallacy or QGF)—in the alternating offer multilateral bargaining game. We prove that a QRE of this game exists and characterize the unique solution to the proposer's problem—that is, the proposal observed most frequently in a QRE. We structurally estimate this model on data from laboratory experiments, and show that it explains behavior better than the model with perfect best response: receivers vote probabilistically; proposers allocate resources mostly within a minimum winning coalition of legislators but do not fully exploit their bargaining power. Incorporating history-dependent beliefs about the future distribution of proposal power into the QRE model (QGF) leads to an even better match with the data, as this model implies slightly lower shares to the proposer, maintaining similar or higher frequencies of minimum winning coalitions and similar voting behavior.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    AH - Economics

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Games and Economic Behavior

  • ISSN

    0899-8256

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    99

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    September

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    20

  • Pages from-to

    275-294

  • UT code for WoS article

    000386194300019

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-84992093316