A Comparative Analysis of Methods for Evaluation of ECG Signal Quality after Compression
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081731%3A_____%2F18%3A00493250" target="_blank" >RIV/68081731:_____/18:00493250 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216305:26220/18:PU128272
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1868519" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1868519</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1868519" target="_blank" >10.1155/2018/1868519</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
A Comparative Analysis of Methods for Evaluation of ECG Signal Quality after Compression
Original language description
The assessment of ECG signal quality after compression is an essential part of the compression process. Compression facilitates the signal archiving, speeds up signal transmission, and reduces the energy consumption. Conversely, lossy compression distorts the signals. Therefore, it is necessary to express the compression performance through both compression efficiency and signal quality. This paper provides an overview of objective algorithms for the assessment of both ECG signal quality after compression and compression efficiency. In this area, there is a lack of standardization, and there is no extensive review as such. 40 methods were tested in terms of their suitability for quality assessment. For this purpose, the whole CSE database was used. The tested signals were compressed using an algorithm based on SPIHT with varying efficiency. As a reference, compressed signals were manually assessed by two experts and classified into three quality groups. Owing to the experts' classification, we determined corresponding ranges of selected quality evaluation methods' values. The suitability of the methods for quality assessment was evaluated based on five criteria. For the assessment of ECG signal quality after compression, we recommend using a combination of these methods: PSim SDNN, QS, SNR1, MSE, PRDN1, MAX, STDERR, and WEDD SWT.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20601 - Medical engineering
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2018
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
BioMed Research International
ISSN
2314-6133
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
2018
Issue of the periodical within the volume
JUL
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
26
Pages from-to
1-26
UT code for WoS article
000439226000001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85050985052