All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Historical context and influential interpretations of the six principles of writing theory

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378009%3A_____%2F23%3A00586806" target="_blank" >RIV/68378009:_____/23:00586806 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://hdl.handle.net/11104/0356308" target="_blank" >https://hdl.handle.net/11104/0356308</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.18369/WACCS.2023.6.2.39" target="_blank" >10.18369/WACCS.2023.6.2.39</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Historical context and influential interpretations of the six principles of writing theory

  • Original language description

    Aspects of the liu shu六書 theory continue to be used today to analyse Chinese characters, yet most scholars are unaware of the historical context out of which the theory emerged and thencontroversies surrounding its both initial and subsequent interpretations. I trace the origins of the theory to the Eastern Han and compare its three earliest rival formulations. Subsequent centuries saw a proliferation of interpretations which rendered any attempt at a unified vision of Chinese writing impossible. The trend of adding new explanations was only reversed by the Qing scholars Dai Zhen and Duan Yucai who, drawing on some of the earliest explanations, argued that the theory encapsulated not only the way characters were composed but also their exegesis. Even if they laid the ground for a shared interpretation, Dai and Duan’s take on the Eastern Han scholar Xu Shen did not go unchallenged. I discuss Zhang Taiyan’s and Lu Zongda’s criticism and their attempts to reconcile aspects of the traditional framework with modern linguistics. I finally contrast this updating of an ancient theory with the approach of Qiu Xigui who selectively discards one of the principles and thereby the very feasibility of the framework as a whole.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>ost</sub> - Miscellaneous article in a specialist periodical

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60203 - Linguistics

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    The International Journal of Chinese Character Studies

  • ISSN

    2384-3152

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    6

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    KR - KOREA, REPUBLIC OF

  • Number of pages

    38

  • Pages from-to

    39-76

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database