Max Dvořák’s Michelangelo
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378033%3A_____%2F21%3A00555350" target="_blank" >RIV/68378033:_____/21:00555350 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2021/11/murar.pdf" target="_blank" >https://arthistoriography.files.wordpress.com/2021/11/murar.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.48352/uobxjah.00003469" target="_blank" >10.48352/uobxjah.00003469</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Max Dvořák’s Michelangelo
Original language description
The historiography of Dvořák’s conception of Mannerism has been neglected in explaining how Dvořák formulated Mannerism: what in Dvořák’s conception of art generated the need to describe the art of the late 16th century as a separate artistic style distinct from the Renaissance? As the study shows, the answer to this question may be found in Max Dvořák’s interpretation of the late art of Michelangelo Buonarroti.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>ost</sub> - Miscellaneous article in a specialist periodical
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60401 - Arts, Art history
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Art Historiography
ISSN
2042-4752
e-ISSN
2042-4752
Volume of the periodical
13
Issue of the periodical within the volume
25
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
17
Pages from-to
1-17
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—