Modeling Edar expression reveals the hidden dynamics of tooth signaling center patterning
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378041%3A_____%2F19%3A00508509" target="_blank" >RIV/68378041:_____/19:00508509 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000064" target="_blank" >https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000064</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000064" target="_blank" >10.1371/journal.pbio.3000064</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Modeling Edar expression reveals the hidden dynamics of tooth signaling center patterning
Original language description
When patterns are set during embryogenesis, it is expected that they are straightly established rather than subsequently modified. The patterning of the three mouse molars is, however, far from straight, likely as a result of mouse evolutionary history. The first-formed tooth signaling centers, called MS and R2, disappear before driving tooth formation and are thought to be vestiges of the premolars found in mouse ancestors. Moreover, the mature signaling center of the first molar (M1) is formed from the fusion of two signaling centers (R2 and early M1). Here, we report that broad activation of Edar expression precedes its spatial restriction to tooth signaling centers. This reveals a hidden two-step patterning process for tooth signaling centers, which was modeled with a single activator-inhibitor pair subject to reaction-diffusion (RD). The study of Edar expression also unveiled successive phases of signaling center formation, erasing, recovering, and fusion. Our model, in which R2 signaling center is not intrinsically defective but erased by the broad activation preceding M1 signaling center formation, predicted the surprising rescue of R2 in Edar mutant mice, where activation is reduced. The importance of this R2-M1 interaction was confirmed by ex vivo cultures showing that R2 is capable of forming a tooth. Finally, by introducing chemotaxis as a secondary process to RD, we recapitulated in silico different conditions in which R2 and M1 centers fuse or not. In conclusion, pattern formation in the mouse molar field relies on basic mechanisms whose dynamics produce embryonic patterns that are plastic objects rather than fixed end points.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10605 - Developmental biology
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GB14-37368G" target="_blank" >GB14-37368G: Centre of orofacial development and regeneration</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
PLoS Biology
ISSN
1545-7885
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
17
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
17
Pages from-to
e3000064
UT code for WoS article
000460317100011
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85061957841