All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

A Comparative Study of Indoor Accuracies Between SLAM and Static Scanners

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F25%3A00384662" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/25:00384662 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/app15148053" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3390/app15148053</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app15148053" target="_blank" >10.3390/app15148053</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    A Comparative Study of Indoor Accuracies Between SLAM and Static Scanners

  • Original language description

    This study presents a comprehensive comparison of static and SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) laser scanners of both new and old generation in a controlled indoor environment of a standard commercial building with long, linear corridors and recesses. The aim was to assess both global and local accuracy, as well as noise characteristics, of each scanner. Methods: A highly accurate static scanner was used to generate a reference point cloud. Five devices were evaluated: two static scanners (Leica RTC 360 and Trimble X7) and three SLAM scanners (GeoSLAM ZEB Horizon RT, Emesent Hovermap ST-X, and FARO Orbis). Accuracy analysis included systematic and random error assessment, axis-specific displacement evaluation, and profile-based local accuracy measurements. Additionally, noise was quantified before and after data smoothing. Static scanners yielded superior accuracies, with the Leica RTC 360 achieving the best performance (absolute accuracy of 1.2 mm). Among SLAM systems, the Emesent Hovermap ST-X and FARO Orbis-both newer-generation devices-demonstrated significant improvements over the older-generation GeoSLAM ZEB Horizon RT. After smoothing, the noise levels of these new-generation SLAM scanners (approx. 2.1-2.2 mm) approached those of static systems. The findings underline the ongoing technological progress in SLAM systems, with the new-generation SLAM scanners becoming increasingly viable alternatives to static scanners, especially when speed, ease of use, and reduced occlusions are prioritized. This makes them well-suited for rapid indoor mapping applications, provided that the slightly lower accuracy is acceptable for the intended use.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20101 - Civil engineering

Result continuities

  • Project

    Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Applied Sciences

  • ISSN

    2076-3417

  • e-ISSN

    2076-3417

  • Volume of the periodical

    15

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    14

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    24

  • Pages from-to

    1-24

  • UT code for WoS article

    001549332100001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105011688250