All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Testing the accuracy and characteristics of data acquired using DJI Zenmuse L1 and L2 lidar systems and photogrammetric data acquired using DJI Zenmuse P1 in a quarry environment

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F25%3A00386750" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/25:00386750 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2025.2595361" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2025.2595361</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2025.2595361" target="_blank" >10.1080/22797254.2025.2595361</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Testing the accuracy and characteristics of data acquired using DJI Zenmuse L1 and L2 lidar systems and photogrammetric data acquired using DJI Zenmuse P1 in a quarry environment

  • Original language description

    The present study aimed to compare the performance of the DJI Zenmuse L2 lidar scanner for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) with that of the previous generation of the same system (DJI Zenmuse L1) and a cloud derived by photogrammetry (DJI Zenmuse P1) in a quarry area. A reference cloud was acquired using a terrestrial laser scanner Leica P40. The results show a major improvement in the L2 accuracy compared with the older L1 scanner, particularly where the overall accuracy after smoothing (RMSES = 0.03 m for L2, compared to 0.05 m for L1) and noise (RMSENOISE of 0.026 and 0.045 m for L2 and L1) are concerned. Color displacement, however, remained practically identical between L1 and L2, reaching a maximum of almost 0.35 m. The accuracy of the photogrammetric point cloud was still somewhat better than the new generation L2 scanner (RMSEO = 0.017 m); however, where practical applicability is concerned, the accuracy provided by the new generation lidar scanner is sufficient for a vast majority of applications and considering other advantages of lidar over photo-grammetry, the new generation scanning technology has the potential to replace photogrammetry in the acquisition of point clouds using UAV in the foreseeable future.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10500 - Earth and related environmental sciences

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EH23_020%2F0008487" target="_blank" >EH23_020/0008487: Innovative methods of materials diagnostics and monitoring of engineering infrastructure to increase its durability and service time (INODIN)</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    European Journal of Remote Sensing

  • ISSN

    2279-7254

  • e-ISSN

    2279-7254

  • Volume of the periodical

    58

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    16

  • Pages from-to

  • UT code for WoS article

    001634143300001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105024192163