Assessment of Residual Mass Estimation Methods for Cylinder Pressure Heat Release Analysis of HCCI Engines with Negative Valve Overlap
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21220%2F11%3A00229500" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21220/11:00229500 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1627311&resultClick=1" target="_blank" >http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1627311&resultClick=1</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ICEF2011-60167" target="_blank" >10.1115/ICEF2011-60167</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Assessment of Residual Mass Estimation Methods for Cylinder Pressure Heat Release Analysis of HCCI Engines with Negative Valve Overlap
Original language description
Increased residual levels in Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) engines employing valve strategies such as recompression or negative valve overlap (NVO) imply that accurate estimation of residual gas fraction (RGF) is critical for cylinder pressure heat release analysis. The objective of the present work was to evaluate three residual estimation methods and assess their suitability under naturally aspirated and boosted HCCI operating conditions: i) the Simple State Equation method employs the Ideal Gas Law at exhaust valve closing (EVC); ii) the Mirsky method assumes isentropic exhaust process; and iii) the Fitzgerald method models in-cylinder temperature from exhaust valve opening (EVO) to EVC by accounting for heat loss during the exhaust process and uses measured exhaust temperature for calibration. Simulations with a calibrated and validated "virtual engine" were performed for representative HCCI operating conditions of engine speed, fuel-air equivalence ratio, NVO and intake pressure (boosting). The State Equation method always overestimated RGF by more than 10%. The Mirsky method was most robust, with average errors between 3-5%. The Fitzgerald method performed consistently better, ranging from no error to 5%, where increased boosting caused the largest discrepancies. A sensitivity study was also performed and determined that the Mirsky method was most robust to possible pressure and temperature measurement errors.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
JT - Propulsion, engines and fuels
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/ED2.1.00%2F03.0125" target="_blank" >ED2.1.00/03.0125: Acquisition of Technology for Vehicle Center of Sustainable Mobility</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2011
Confidentiality
C - Předmět řešení projektu podléhá obchodnímu tajemství (§ 504 Občanského zákoníku), ale název projektu, cíle projektu a u ukončeného nebo zastaveného projektu zhodnocení výsledku řešení projektu (údaje P03, P04, P15, P19, P29, PN8) dodané do CEP, jsou upraveny tak, aby byly zveřejnitelné.
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
Proceedings of the ASME 2011 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference
ISBN
978-0-7918-4442-7
ISSN
1066-5048
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
10
Pages from-to
481-490
Publisher name
American Society of Mechanical Engineers - ASME
Place of publication
New York
Event location
Morgantown
Event date
Oct 2, 2011
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
—