All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Validation data set for testing the criteria for multiaxial fatigue strength estimation

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21220%2F18%3A00324798" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21220/18:00324798 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ffe.12822" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ffe.12822</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12822" target="_blank" >10.1111/ffe.12822</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Validation data set for testing the criteria for multiaxial fatigue strength estimation

  • Original language description

    This paper describes the way in which a specialized validation set intended for quick validation of new multiaxial fatigue strength estimation models in the high-cycle fatigue regime was prepared. The rules established for accepting various data sets into the complete FatLim database are briefly described. This final FatLim database contained 282 data items at the moment this paper was written. The paper describes how FatLim has been reduced to a smaller validation set, marked as AMSD25. The criteria used for accepting the data items for this small-scale test set are based on evaluating the mean and the standard deviation of the fatigue index errors obtained for each data item on the basis of 18 different prediction criteria. The items that got into the AMSD25 validation set are described, and potential issues are noted. The comparison between the original FatLim validation set and the shortened AMSD25 data set is presented. It shows that the in-phase load cases without any mean stress effect are generally well mastered by most criteria, and they can be excluded as insignificant from any such analysis. However, the mean stress effect is generally poorly incorporated. Future multiaxial fatigue strength criteria should focus on load cases including mean stresses.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20302 - Applied mechanics

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EF16_019%2F0000826" target="_blank" >EF16_019/0000826: Center of Advanced Aerospace Technology</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2018

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures

  • ISSN

    8756-758X

  • e-ISSN

    1460-2695

  • Volume of the periodical

    41

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    11

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    2259-2271

  • UT code for WoS article

    000448893000006

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85046019878