All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Selection of a separation method used for harvesting of microalgae from aqueous solutions

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21220%2F21%3A00350192" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21220/21:00350192 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2186027" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2186027</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3303/CET2186027" target="_blank" >10.3303/CET2186027</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Selection of a separation method used for harvesting of microalgae from aqueous solutions

  • Original language description

    Harvesting of microalgae from aqueous solutions is still a bottleneck for biotechnologies using microalgae as a source of metabolites. The aim of the article is to provide an overview of four microalgae separation methods and highlight their core advantages, disadvantages, efficiencies and energy and economy requirements for various concentrations of microalgae suspensions and different microalgae strains. These four separation methods are centrifugation, coagulation/flocculation, flotation and membrane technologies. Possible optimizations of the separation methods inducing more effective harvesting are proposed as well. Based on the data included in the article, final conclusions are presented and the separation methods are compared. Flotation harvesting efficiency is more than 75 % when chemicals enhancing the process are applied. Harvesting efficiency of coagulation and flocculation achieves more than 80 %. Harvesting efficiency of membrane technologies and centrifugation is more than 90 %. The energy requirements are in the range of 0.07 to 11.1 kWh m-3 of the permeate or microalgal suspension volume and 0.09 to 9.5 kWh kg-1 of the dry weight of harvested biomass, depending on the separation method.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20402 - Chemical process engineering

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EF16_019%2F0000753" target="_blank" >EF16_019/0000753: Research centre for low-carbon energy technologies</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS

  • ISSN

    2283-9216

  • e-ISSN

    2283-9216

  • Volume of the periodical

    86

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    027

  • Country of publishing house

    IT - ITALY

  • Number of pages

    6

  • Pages from-to

    157-162

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85109505173