Experimental analysis of novel ionic liquid-MXene hybrid nanofluid's energy storage properties: Model-prediction using modern ensemble machine learning methods
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21220%2F22%3A00358157" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21220/22:00358157 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.104858" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.104858</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.104858" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.est.2022.104858</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Experimental analysis of novel ionic liquid-MXene hybrid nanofluid's energy storage properties: Model-prediction using modern ensemble machine learning methods
Original language description
The current work employs two modern ensemble machine learning algorithms, Matern 5/2 Gaussian process regression (GPR) and quadratic support vector regression (SVR), to model-predict the thermal conductivity, specific heat, and viscosity of novel Ionic liquid-MXene hybrid nanofluids. The data for model development was obtained in the lab at various temperatures and mass concentrations. The obtained thermal conductivity value for the pure aqueous Ionic liquid (IL) solution at 20 °C was 0.443 W/m⋅K which rose to 0.82 W/m⋅K due to the inclusion of 0.5 wt% MXene nanomaterial. The achieved result for the specific heat capacity of the pure aqueous IL solution is 1.985 J/g⋅K, while this value enhances up to 2.374 J/g⋅K due to the inclusion of the highest loading concentration (0.5 wt%) of MXene nanomaterial. The acquired data was divided into two portions, with 70% of the data utilized for model training and 30% (hold-out) data used for model testing. Several statistical indicators were used to evaluate the GPR and SVR-based prognostic models created for specific heat, viscosity, and thermal conductivity. For SVM models, the correlation coefficient (R) ranged from 0.9741 to 0.9958, while for GPR-based models, it ranged from 0.9942 to 0.9998. The inaccuracy in the prediction model was quantified using root mean squared error, which ranged from 0.0129 to 0.0398 for SVM-based models and 0.004 to 0.105 for GPR-based models. The predictive effectiveness of the models was tested using Willmott's Index of Agreement, which was 0.9833 to 0.999 for SVM-based models and 0.9834 to 0.9999 for GPR-based models, respectively. The close to unity regression coefficient, low model error, and good prediction effectiveness illustrate the robustness of both SVM and GPR prognostic models. However, the GPR outperformed the SVM on all the statistical indices. The experiment results were also used to compute the Mouromtseff number (<4) and Figure of merit (>1). The results showed that the studied nanofluids can successfully substitute water in specified applications for solar energy.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20303 - Thermodynamics
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Energy Storage
ISSN
2352-152X
e-ISSN
2352-1538
Volume of the periodical
2022 (52)
Issue of the periodical within the volume
05
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
13
Pages from-to
—
UT code for WoS article
000807731100001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85130572918