All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Bridging the Explanation Gap in AI Security: A Task-Driven Approach to XAI Methods Evaluation

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21230%2F24%3A00373606" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21230/24:00373606 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.5220/0012475200003636" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.5220/0012475200003636</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0012475200003636" target="_blank" >10.5220/0012475200003636</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Bridging the Explanation Gap in AI Security: A Task-Driven Approach to XAI Methods Evaluation

  • Original language description

    Deciding which XAI technique is best depends not only on the domain, but also on the given task, the dataset used, the model being explained, and the target goal of that model. We argue that the evaluation of XAI methods has not been thoroughly analyzed in the network security domain, which presents a unique type of challenge. While there are XAI methods applied in network security there is still a large gap between the needs of security stakeholders and the selection of the optimal method. We propose to approach the problem by first defining the stack-holders in security and their prototypical tasks. Each task defines inputs and specific needs for explanations. Based on these explanation needs (e.g. understanding the performance, or stealing a model), we created five XAI evaluation techniques that are used to compare and select which XAI method is best for each task (dataset, model, and goal). Our proposed approach was evaluated by running experiments for different security stakehol ders, machine learning models, and XAI methods. Results were compared with the AutoXAI technique and random selection. Results show that our proposal to evaluate and select XAI methods for network security is well-grounded and that it can help AI security practitioners find better explanations for their given tasks.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/VJ02010020" target="_blank" >VJ02010020: AI-Dojo: Multiagent Testbed for Research and Testing of AI-driven Cybersecurity Technologies</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (Volume 3)

  • ISBN

    978-989-758-680-4

  • ISSN

    2184-3589

  • e-ISSN

    2184-433X

  • Number of pages

    8

  • Pages from-to

    1370-1377

  • Publisher name

    Science and Technology Publications, Lda

  • Place of publication

    Setúbal

  • Event location

    Rome

  • Event date

    Feb 24, 2024

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article