Advocacy for Permanent Public Art: Controversy and Benefits

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21450%2F15%3A00241242" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21450/15:00241242 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Advocacy for Permanent Public Art: Controversy and Benefits
Original language description
In this paper I focus on the controversy of permanent public art as well as its possible benefits. There was a strong advocacy for permanent public art from the 60s to 80s. From the mid-80s the critical writings target unfulfilled hopes for social changethat permanent public art was expected to generate and controversial role in urban regeneration. Since the 90s, the importance of community-based art and temporal interventions have been emphasized. New genre public art is seen as the way of social change; to be truly ?for people? and ?from people?. It is more independent of the political, economic and cultural powers and underpins the democratic values. The often mentioned polarities of ?permanent ? temporal? public art are followed with determinations as ?instrument of power ? critical to the power structures?, ?object-oriented ? public concerned?. Considering specific historical context of the Czech Republic, the lack of any kind of official support has significantly influenced the
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Publication year
2015
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)