What's Happening to Architectural Sketching?: Interviewing architects about transformation from traditional to digital architectural sketching as a communicational tool with clients
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21450%2F22%3A00362552" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21450/22:00362552 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://papers.cumincad.org/cgi-bin/works/paper/ecaade2022_398" target="_blank" >http://papers.cumincad.org/cgi-bin/works/paper/ecaade2022_398</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
What's Happening to Architectural Sketching?: Interviewing architects about transformation from traditional to digital architectural sketching as a communicational tool with clients
Original language description
The paper discusses 23 interviewed architects in practice about the role of traditional and digital sketching (human-computer interaction) in communication with the client. They were selected from I995 to 20I8 (the interval of graduation) from three different countries: The Czech Republic (CR), Slovakia (SR), Netherland (NR). To realize three blending areas that impact the approach to sketching: (I) Traditional hand and physical model studies (I995-2003). (II)Transition form-designing by hand and PC (2004—20I7). (III) Mainly digital and remote forms of designing (20I8-now). Interviews helped transform 3I "parameters of tools use " from the previous theoretical framework narrowed down into six main areas: (I) Implementation; (2)Affordability; (3)Timesaving; (3) Drawing support; (5) Representativeness; (6) Transportability. Paper discusses findings from interviewees: (A) Implementation issues are above time and price. (B) Strongly different understanding of what digital sketching is. From drawing in Google Slides by mouse to sketching in Metaverse. (C) Substantial reduction of traditional sketching (down to a total of 3% of the time) at the expense of growing responsibilities. (D) 80% of respondents do not recommend sketching in front of the client. Also, other interesting findings are further described in the discussion.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
20103 - Architecture engineering
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
eCAADe 2022 Co-creating the Future: Inclusion in and through Design
ISBN
9789491207327
ISSN
2684-1843
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
11
Pages from-to
389-399
Publisher name
European Association for education and Research in CAAD in Europe
Place of publication
Brusel
Event location
Ghent
Event date
Sep 13, 2022
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
—