All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

3D barycentric interpolation method for animal brainmapping

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21460%2F19%3A00337047" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21460/19:00337047 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00023752:_____/19:43920422

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/EHB47216.2019.8969996" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1109/EHB47216.2019.8969996</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EHB47216.2019.8969996" target="_blank" >10.1109/EHB47216.2019.8969996</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    3D barycentric interpolation method for animal brainmapping

  • Original language description

    The evaluation of electroencephalographic (EEG) signals is very crucial for human studies. Mostly there are animal recordings of EEG used for further research as well. One of the often used quantitative EEG methods for EEG analysis is topographical mapping. The barycentric interpolation method for 3D animal brain-mapping was implemented and tested. The 3D spline and spherical spline interpolation methods were used for comparison purpose. The surrogate data and real EEG recording were used for the interpolation methods testing. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and significant probability mapping via Fisher non-parametric permutation test were used for evaluation. The RMSE of surrogate data was 0.070 for 3D spline, 0.594 for spherical spline and 0.321 for 3D barycentric interpolation method. The RMSE of the real EEG recordings nearby the electrodes was 0.1848 for 3D spline, 1.1027 for spherical spline and 0.0001 for 3D barycentric interpolation method. The 3D barycentric method differs from the 3D spline interpolation method in the large area on 0.001 alpha level based on significant probability mapping. The non-significant parts are only in the nearby electrode area. The 3D spline interpolation method gives the best results based on RMSE and significant probability testing.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20601 - Medical engineering

Result continuities

  • Project

    Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2019

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    IEEE E-HEALTH AND BIOENGINEERING EHB 2019

  • ISBN

    978-1-7281-2603-6

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

    2575-5145

  • Number of pages

    4

  • Pages from-to

  • Publisher name

    Gr. T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy

  • Place of publication

    Iasi

  • Event location

    Iasi

  • Event date

    Nov 21, 2019

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    000558648300128