All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of Electronic Prescription Systems in the European Union: Benchmarking Development, Use, and Future Trends

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21460%2F25%3A00381928" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21460/25:00381928 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2025.3531317" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2025.3531317</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2025.3531317" target="_blank" >10.1109/JBHI.2025.3531317</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of Electronic Prescription Systems in the European Union: Benchmarking Development, Use, and Future Trends

  • Original language description

    While Electronic Prescription Systems (EPS) adoption varies across EU Member States, there's a lack of comprehensive comparative analysis. Existing studies focus on single EPSs, employ diverse methodologies, and lack up-to-date data. This study fills this gap by providing a comprehensive overview of EPS development, functionalities, and usage statistics in each EU Member State. Most EU Member States widely adopted EPS by 2022, with exceptions including Germany, France, and Luxembourg, where pilot projects or just plans existed at that time. Out of the 27 EPSs, 25 employ a similar design featuring a central server and end-user software or web-based applications. Among these, 22 are structured as single national systems. The fundamental technical solution is remarkably similar across the EU. Despite these similarities, functionalities, authentication methods, prescription validity, and medication coverage differ significantly among EPSs. A multinational team, including co-authors from each EU Member State, collected data using a structured questionnaire. The study underscores the need for standardized methodologies in EPS research and emphasizes the importance of comprehensive comparative analysis to inform healthcare policies and digitalization efforts.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

  • ISSN

    2168-2194

  • e-ISSN

    2168-2208

  • Volume of the periodical

    29

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    5

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

    3712-3722

  • UT code for WoS article

    001484010400007

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85218749388