Comparison of Electronic Prescription Systems in the European Union: Benchmarking Development, Use, and Future Trends
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21460%2F25%3A00381928" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21460/25:00381928 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2025.3531317" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2025.3531317</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2025.3531317" target="_blank" >10.1109/JBHI.2025.3531317</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Comparison of Electronic Prescription Systems in the European Union: Benchmarking Development, Use, and Future Trends
Original language description
While Electronic Prescription Systems (EPS) adoption varies across EU Member States, there's a lack of comprehensive comparative analysis. Existing studies focus on single EPSs, employ diverse methodologies, and lack up-to-date data. This study fills this gap by providing a comprehensive overview of EPS development, functionalities, and usage statistics in each EU Member State. Most EU Member States widely adopted EPS by 2022, with exceptions including Germany, France, and Luxembourg, where pilot projects or just plans existed at that time. Out of the 27 EPSs, 25 employ a similar design featuring a central server and end-user software or web-based applications. Among these, 22 are structured as single national systems. The fundamental technical solution is remarkably similar across the EU. Despite these similarities, functionalities, authentication methods, prescription validity, and medication coverage differ significantly among EPSs. A multinational team, including co-authors from each EU Member State, collected data using a structured questionnaire. The study underscores the need for standardized methodologies in EPS research and emphasizes the importance of comprehensive comparative analysis to inform healthcare policies and digitalization efforts.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
ISSN
2168-2194
e-ISSN
2168-2208
Volume of the periodical
29
Issue of the periodical within the volume
5
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
11
Pages from-to
3712-3722
UT code for WoS article
001484010400007
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85218749388