All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Co-Based Amorphous Material for Giant Magneto-Impedance and Fluxgate Sensing Cores

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21720%2F15%3A00313093" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21720/15:00313093 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/INTMAG.2015.7157709" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/INTMAG.2015.7157709</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/INTMAG.2015.7157709" target="_blank" >10.1109/INTMAG.2015.7157709</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Co-Based Amorphous Material for Giant Magneto-Impedance and Fluxgate Sensing Cores

  • Original language description

    Soft magnetic materials rich on iron or cobalt have found vast range of usability for sensors such as fluxgates [1] and also, the recently re-invented, magneto-impedance sensors [2]. Giant magneto-impedance (GMI) has experienced huge increase of interest since the late 80's. Although the fluxgate sensor is commercially available, the easy manufacturing of GMI sensors, possibility of miniaturization put attention to many scientists for developing such sensor in many applications. However, GMI sensor has major drawback of large temperature sensitivity [3]. In precise applications, fluxgate sensors are preferred over GMI, which do not saturate the ferromagnetic core and therefore may exhibit perming error. On the other side, the GMI sensors compete with significantly longer period of the development of fluxgates and recently are commercially used for evaluation of microstructural degradation in ferromagnetic materials [4]. Mostly for GMI sensors, amorphous/ nanostructured wires are used rather than ribbons as wire shaped sample has better GMI characteristics than ribbon [5] due to the formation of circumferential anisotropy in wire. On the other hand wires can be used for orthogonal fluxgates but ribbons are preferred over wires for commercial use as they have been tested for last few decades. The magnetization process for the ribbon and the wire shaped samples are assumed to be different presumably due to the difference in cooling process. However, in both cases, the materials should have very low saturation magnetostriction constant and high permeability. The present paper is to understand the variation of sensing properties of the ribbon and wire shaped materials having the same composition, which can be operated both in the GMI and the fluxgate sensing cores and test them in both sensors.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20201 - Electrical and electronic engineering

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2015

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    2015 IEEE International Magnetics Conference

  • ISBN

    978-1-4799-7322-4

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    2

  • Pages from-to

  • Publisher name

    Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers

  • Place of publication

    Beijing

  • Event location

    Beijing

  • Event date

    May 11, 2015

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article