All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

The degree of grammaticalization of gotta, gonna, wanna and better: A corpus study

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70883521%3A28150%2F15%3A43873249" target="_blank" >RIV/70883521:28150/15:43873249 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/topling.2015.15.issue-1/topling-2015-0005/topling-2015-0005.xml" target="_blank" >http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/topling.2015.15.issue-1/topling-2015-0005/topling-2015-0005.xml</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/topling-2015-0005" target="_blank" >10.2478/topling-2015-0005</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    The degree of grammaticalization of gotta, gonna, wanna and better: A corpus study

  • Original language description

    The paper studies the degree of grammaticalization of the structures gotta, gonna, wanna and better. The study presumes that the semantics of these structures - more precisely their modal polyfunctionality (i.e. the ability to express deontic and epistemic meaning at the same time) - has an impact on their morphosyntactic properties. Using corpora (predominantly the British National Corpus and the Corpus of Contemporary American English) and web forums, the paper studies in detail the level of independence of gotta, gonna, wanna and better from their respective auxiliaries (have and be) and the development of the operator properties of these structures typical for central modals (i.e. inversion in questions, compatibility with clausal negation and occurrence in elliptical contexts). It demonstrates that gonna and gotta are partially grammaticalized, especially with respect to the independence of their auxiliaries, but they do not syntactically behave as modals. The verb wanna behaves a

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    AI - Linguistics

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2015

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Topics in Linguistics

  • ISSN

    1337-7590

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    15

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    PL - POLAND

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

    "Neuvedeno"

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database