All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Is the best–worst method path dependent? Evidence from an empirical study

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70883521%3A28150%2F23%3A63570498" target="_blank" >RIV/70883521:28150/23:63570498 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10288-023-00553-5#citeas" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10288-023-00553-5#citeas</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10288-023-00553-5" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10288-023-00553-5</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Is the best–worst method path dependent? Evidence from an empirical study

  • Original language description

    The Best–Worst method (BWM) is one of the latest contributions to pairwise comparisons methods. As its name suggests, it is based on pairwise comparisons of all criteria (or possibly other objects, such as alternatives, sub-criteria, etc.) with respect to the best (most important) and the worst (least important) criterion. The main aim of this study is to investigate the path and scale dependency of the BWM. Up to now, it is unknown whether the weights of compared objects obtained by the method differ when the objects are compared first with the best object, and then with the worst, or vice versa. It is also unknown if the outcomes of the method differ when compared objects are presented in a different order, or when different scales are applied. Therefore, an experiment in a laboratory setting is performed with more than 800 respondents university undergraduates from two countries in which the respondents compare areas of randomly generated figures and the relative size of objects is then estimated via the linearized version of the BWM. Last but not least, the accuracy of the BWM is examined with respect to different comparison scales, including Saaty’s nine-point linguistic scale, an integer scale from 1 to 9, and a continuous scale from 1 to infinity.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50204 - Business and management

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    4OR - A Quarterly Journal of Operations Research

  • ISSN

    1619-4500

  • e-ISSN

    1614-2411

  • Volume of the periodical

    Neuveden

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    Neuvedeno

  • Country of publishing house

    DE - GERMANY

  • Number of pages

    24

  • Pages from-to

    "Nestránkováno"

  • UT code for WoS article

    001093662800001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database