Is the best–worst method path dependent? Evidence from an empirical study
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70883521%3A28150%2F23%3A63570498" target="_blank" >RIV/70883521:28150/23:63570498 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10288-023-00553-5#citeas" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10288-023-00553-5#citeas</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10288-023-00553-5" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10288-023-00553-5</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Is the best–worst method path dependent? Evidence from an empirical study
Original language description
The Best–Worst method (BWM) is one of the latest contributions to pairwise comparisons methods. As its name suggests, it is based on pairwise comparisons of all criteria (or possibly other objects, such as alternatives, sub-criteria, etc.) with respect to the best (most important) and the worst (least important) criterion. The main aim of this study is to investigate the path and scale dependency of the BWM. Up to now, it is unknown whether the weights of compared objects obtained by the method differ when the objects are compared first with the best object, and then with the worst, or vice versa. It is also unknown if the outcomes of the method differ when compared objects are presented in a different order, or when different scales are applied. Therefore, an experiment in a laboratory setting is performed with more than 800 respondents university undergraduates from two countries in which the respondents compare areas of randomly generated figures and the relative size of objects is then estimated via the linearized version of the BWM. Last but not least, the accuracy of the BWM is examined with respect to different comparison scales, including Saaty’s nine-point linguistic scale, an integer scale from 1 to 9, and a continuous scale from 1 to infinity.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50204 - Business and management
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
4OR - A Quarterly Journal of Operations Research
ISSN
1619-4500
e-ISSN
1614-2411
Volume of the periodical
Neuveden
Issue of the periodical within the volume
Neuvedeno
Country of publishing house
DE - GERMANY
Number of pages
24
Pages from-to
"Nestránkováno"
UT code for WoS article
001093662800001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—