Potential impact of meat replacers on nutrient quality and greenhouse gas emissions of diets in four European countries
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F75010330%3A_____%2F20%3A00013310" target="_blank" >RIV/75010330:_____/20:00013310 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6838" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6838</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12176838" target="_blank" >10.3390/su12176838</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Potential impact of meat replacers on nutrient quality and greenhouse gas emissions of diets in four European countries
Original language description
Meat replacers could play a role in achieving more plant-based diets, but their current consumption is limited. The present modelling study aimed to explore the nutritional and greenhouse gas emissions impacts of meat replacers. Using dietary surveys from Denmark, Czech Republic, Italy and France (similar to 6500 adults), we composed alternative diets in which all the meat in the observed diet (in grams) was substituted by similar use meat replacers (with and without fortification). Starting from the observed diets and meat-replacement diets, diets with improved adherence to food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) were modelled using Data Envelopment Analysis. These improved diets were then further optimised for dietary preferences (MaxP, diet similarity index), nutrient quality (MaxH, Nutrient Rich Diet score, NRD15.3) or diet-related greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) (MaxS, CO(2)equivalents). In all optimised modelled diets, the total amount of meat was lower than in the observed diets, i.e., 30% lower in the MaxP, 50% lower in the MaxH, and 75% lower in the MaxS diets. In the MaxP diet, NRD15.3 was similar to 6% higher, GHGE was similar to 9% lower, and similar to 83% of food intake remained similar. In the MaxH diet, NRD15.3 was similar to 17% higher, GHGE was similar to 15% lower, and similar to 66% of food intake remained similar. In the MaxS diet, NRD15.3 was similar to 9% higher, GHGE was similar to 33% lower, and similar to 65% of food intake remained similar. When using fortified meat replacers, for all modelled diets, the diet similarity was on average 2% lower and the GHGE reduction was on average 3% higher as compared with the same scenarios without fortification. This analysis showed that meat replacers, provided their preference is similar to meat, can provide benefits for GHGE, without necessarily compromising nutrient quality.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30304 - Public and environmental health
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK
Others
Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Sustainability
ISSN
2071-1050
e-ISSN
2071-1050
Volume of the periodical
12
Issue of the periodical within the volume
17
Country of publishing house
CH - SWITZERLAND
Number of pages
12
Pages from-to
6838
UT code for WoS article
000569974200001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85090771208