Simplistic understandings of farmer motivations could undermine the environmental potential of the common agricultural policy
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F21%3A00541733" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/21:00541733 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837720304865?via%3Dihub#" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837720304865?via%3Dihub#</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105136" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105136</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Simplistic understandings of farmer motivations could undermine the environmental potential of the common agricultural policy
Original language description
The European Union Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has failed to achieve its aim of preserving European farmland biodiversity, despite massive investment in subsidies to incentivise environmentally-beneficial farming practices. This failure calls into question the design of the subsidy schemes, which are intended to either function as a safety net and make farming profitable or compensate farmers for costs and loss of income while undertaking environmental management. In this study, we assess whether the design of environmental payments in the CAP reflects current knowledge about farmers' decision-making as found in the research literature. We do so on the basis of a comprehensive literature review on farmers' uptake of agri-environmental management practices over the past 10 years and interviews specifically focused on Ecological Focus Areas with policy-makers, advisors and farmers in seven European countries. We find that economic and structural factors are the most commonly identified determinants of farmers' adoption of environmental management practices in the literature and in interviews. However, the literature suggests that these are complemented by and partially dependent on a broad range of social, attitudinal and other contextual factors that are not recognised in interview responses or, potentially, in policy design. The relatively simplistic conceptualisation of farmer behaviour that underlies some aspects of policy design may hamper the effectiveness of environmental payments in the CAP by overemphasising economic considerations, potentially corroding farmer attitudes to policy and environmental objectives. We conclude that an urgent redesign of agricultural subsidies is needed to better align them with the economic, social and environmental factors affecting farmer decision-making in a complex production climate, and therefore to maximise potential environmental benefits.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
40101 - Agriculture
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Land Use Policy
ISSN
0264-8377
e-ISSN
1873-5754
Volume of the periodical
101
Issue of the periodical within the volume
FEB
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
15
Pages from-to
105136
UT code for WoS article
000606823700005
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85094938517