Ultrasound-guided versus conventional femoral venipuncture for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a multicentre randomized efficacy and safety trial (ULTRA-FAST trial)

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023001%3A_____%2F18%3A00077074" target="_blank" >RIV/00023001:_____/18:00077074 - isvavai.cz</a>

Alternative codes found

RIV/27283933:_____/17:00004715

Result on the web

<a href="https://academic.oup.com/europace/article-abstract/20/7/1107/3858381?redirectedFrom=fulltext" target="_blank" >https://academic.oup.com/europace/article-abstract/20/7/1107/3858381?redirectedFrom=fulltext</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/eux175" target="_blank" >10.1093/europace/eux175</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Ultrasound-guided versus conventional femoral venipuncture for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a multicentre randomized efficacy and safety trial (ULTRA-FAST trial)

Original language description

Aims Complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) are frequently related to vascular access. We hypothesized that ultrasound-guided (USG) venipuncture may facilitate the procedure and reduce complication rates. Methods and results We conducted a multicentre, randomized trial in patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF on uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy. The study enrolled consecutive 320 patients (age: 63 +/- 8 years; male: 62%) and were randomized to USG or conventional venipuncture in 1:1 fashion. It was prematurely terminated due to substantially lower-than-expected complication rates, which doubled the population size needed to maintain statistical power. While the complication rates did not differ between two study arms (0.6% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.62), intra-procedural outcome measures were in favour of the USG approach (puncture time, 288 vs. 369 s, P &lt; 0.001; first pass success, 74% vs. 20%, P &lt; 0.001; extra puncture attempts 0.5 vs. 2.1, P &lt; 0.001; inadvertent arterial puncture 0.07 vs. 0.25, P &lt; 0.001; unsuccessful cannulation 0.6% vs. 14%, P &lt; 0.001). Though these measures varied between trainees (49% of procedures) and expert operators, between-arm differences (except for unsuccessful cannulation) were comparably significant in favour of USG approach for both subgroups. Conclusions Ultrasound-guided puncture of femoral veins was associated with preferable intra-procedural outcomes, though the major complication rates were not reduced. Both trainees and expert operators benefited from the USG strategy. (www.clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02834221).

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Project

—

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2018

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Europace

ISSN

1099-5129

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

20

Issue of the periodical within the volume

7

Country of publishing house

GB - UNITED KINGDOM

Number of pages

8

Pages from-to

1107-1114

UT code for WoS article

000439059700010

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85050980529