All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Model-based vs hybrid iterative reconstruction technique in ultralow-dose submillisievert CT colonography

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F15%3A10294946" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/15:10294946 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00159816:_____/15:00064495

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140667" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140667</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140667" target="_blank" >10.1259/bjr.20140667</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Model-based vs hybrid iterative reconstruction technique in ultralow-dose submillisievert CT colonography

  • Original language description

    Objective: To compare image quality of different reconstruction techniques in submillisievert ultralow-dose CT colonography (CTC) and to correlate colonic findings with subsequent optical colonoscopy. Methods: 58 patients underwent ultralow-dose CTC. Theimages were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) or model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) techniques. In each segment, endoluminal noise (expressed as standard deviation of endoluminal density) was measured and image quality was rated on a five-point Likert scale by two independent readers. Colonic lesions were evaluated in consensus and correlated with subsequent optical colonoscopy where possible. Results: The estimated radiation dose was 0.41+/- 0.05mSv for the supine and 0.42 +/- 0.04mSv for the prone acquisitions. In the endoluminal view, the image quality was rated better in HIR, whereas better scores were obtained in MBIR in the cross-sectional view, where the endolumina

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    FP - Other medical fields

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2015

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    British Journal of Radiology

  • ISSN

    0007-1285

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    88

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1048

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    6

  • Pages from-to

  • UT code for WoS article

    000351853900009

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-84930371604