Hybrid and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Influences the Volumetry of Visceral and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue on Ultra-Low-Dose CT
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11120%2F20%3A43920571" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11120/20:43920571 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11110/20:10415049 RIV/00064165:_____/20:10415049
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22945" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22945</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.22945" target="_blank" >10.1002/oby.22945</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Hybrid and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Influences the Volumetry of Visceral and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue on Ultra-Low-Dose CT
Original language description
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare three different reconstruction algorithms for the volumetry of the visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) on ultra-low-dose computed tomography (CT) images. METHODS: Thirty-seven male patients underwent ultra-low-dose CT at the level of the fourth lumbar vertebra (22.5 mm in z-axis). The acquisitions were reconstructed in 5-mm slices with 50% overlap using filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR), and iterative model-based reconstruction (IMR) techniques. The volume of VAT and SAT was measured using an interactive seed-growing segmentation and by thresholding (-30 to -190 HU). RESULTS: The volume of SAT measured by the interactive method was smaller in FBP compared with both HIR (P = 0.0011) and IMR (P = 0.0034), and the volume of VAT was greater in IMR compared with HIR (P = 0.0253) or FBP (P = 0.0065). Using the thresholding method, IMR volumes of VAT were greater compared with HIR (P < 0.0001), and volumes of SAT were greater compared with both HIR and FBP (both P LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO 0.0001). The VAT to SAT ratio was greater in IMR compared with HIR or FBP (both P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences among FBP, HIR, and IMR in the volumetry of SAT and VAT, their ratios, and attenuation measured on ultra-low-dose images.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30202 - Endocrinology and metabolism (including diabetes, hormones)
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/GA16-14048S" target="_blank" >GA16-14048S: Limited adipose tissue expandability as a risk factor for development of type 2 diabetes: the role of preadipocytes (LIMEX)</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Obesity
ISSN
1930-7381
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
28
Issue of the periodical within the volume
11
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
7
Pages from-to
2083-2089
UT code for WoS article
000569488300001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85090944027