Differences in blood pressure among threemeasurement techniques: physiologic, pathologic, or artificial? Reply

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11140%2F20%3A10415613" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11140/20:10415613 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00064190:_____/20:N0000048 RIV/00023001:_____/20:00080488 RIV/00216208:11110/20:10415613
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=fQZgYHfNXT" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=fQZgYHfNXT</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000002498" target="_blank" >10.1097/HJH.0000000000002498</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Differences in blood pressure among threemeasurement techniques: physiologic, pathologic, or artificial? Reply
Original language description
We thank Maniar et al. for their warm comments on our publication comparing three different methods of blood pressure (BP) measurement techniques in an epidemiological setting. However, the authors also raised some concerns, to which we would like to respond to point by point.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Project
<a href="/en/project/NV15-27109A" target="_blank" >NV15-27109A: Longitudinal trends in major cardiovascular risk factors and their predictive value in a population random sample, Czech post-MONICA study</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year
2020
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)