All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Tetracycline Resistance and Presence of Tetracycline Resistance Determinants tet(V) and tap in Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria from Agricultural Soils and Clinical Isolates

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11150%2F12%3A10128706" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11150/12:10128706 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/60077344:_____/12:00388396 RIV/71009396:_____/12:N0000001

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME12028" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME12028</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME12028" target="_blank" >10.1264/jsme2.ME12028</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Tetracycline Resistance and Presence of Tetracycline Resistance Determinants tet(V) and tap in Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria from Agricultural Soils and Clinical Isolates

  • Original language description

    Rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) inhabit soil and water but certain strains represent a health risk for human and animals. Both clinical and soil RGM may be under selection pressure for resistance to tetracycline (TET) antibiotics, since tetracyclinesare administrated to humans and farm animals, and TET residues enter soil through manuring; however, resistance to TET and the presence of TET-resistance genes have been assessed only in clinical isolates. We were therefore interested in comparing soil and clinical RGM in terms of TET resistance and the presence of TET-resistance genes. We used 44 RGM from grasslands with different exposure to animal manure, and 38 clinical RGM from Czech hospitals. There was no difference between the clinical and soilisolates in TET resistance, with >50% resistant isolates in both groups. otr(A), otr(B), tet(K), tet(L) or tet(M) were not detected in any soil or clinical isolate. In contrast, most isolates harbored tet(V) and tap, both encoding mycobac

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    EE - Microbiology, virology

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

    Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2012

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    MICROBES AND ENVIRONMENTS

  • ISSN

    1342-6311

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    27

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    JP - JAPAN

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

    413-422

  • UT code for WoS article

    000312162800010

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database