All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Global measures of syntactic and lexical complexity are not strong predictors of eye-movement patterns in sentence and passage reading

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F26%3ADXKJ7F2H" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/26:DXKJ7F2H - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218251317372" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218251317372</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218251317372" target="_blank" >10.1177/17470218251317372</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Global measures of syntactic and lexical complexity are not strong predictors of eye-movement patterns in sentence and passage reading

  • Original language description

    The link between the cognitive effort of word processing and the eye-movement patterns elicited by that word is well established in psycholinguistic research using eye-tracking. Yet less evidence or consensus exists regarding whether the same link exists between linguistic complexity measures of a sentence or passage and eye movements registered at the sentence or passage level. This article focuses on “global” measures of syntactic and lexical complexity, i.e., the measures that characterise the structure of the sentence or passage rather than aggregate lexical properties of individual words. We selected several commonly used global complexity measures and tested their predictive power against sentence- and passage-level eye movements in samples of text reading from 13 languages represented in the Multilingual Eye Movement Corpus (MECO). While some syntactic or lexical complexity measures elicited statistically significant effects, they were negligibly small and not of practical relevance for predicting the processing effort either in individual languages or across languages. These findings suggest that the “eye-mind” link known to be valid at the word level may not scale up to larger linguistic units. © Experimental Psychology Society 2025.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

  • ISSN

    1747-0218

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    2025

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2025

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    16

  • Pages from-to

    1675 - 1690

  • UT code for WoS article

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105000008402