Self-mention in English Theses: A Corpus-based Comparison of Native-English and Native-Vietnamese Speakers
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F26%3AKDM82S93" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/26:KDM82S93 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105009500585&doi=10.17576%2F3L-2025-3102-13&partnerID=40&md5=9e980bd6d416425a326a0ca097e0f3d4" target="_blank" >https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105009500585&doi=10.17576%2F3L-2025-3102-13&partnerID=40&md5=9e980bd6d416425a326a0ca097e0f3d4</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2025-3102-13" target="_blank" >10.17576/3L-2025-3102-13</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Self-mention in English Theses: A Corpus-based Comparison of Native-English and Native-Vietnamese Speakers
Original language description
There has been an increasing interest in authorial presence in academic writing in the past decades. However, there seems to be a lack of research on novice writers’ writing. This study examines the use of self-mention markers in Master’s theses in TESOL written in English by native-English speakers (NES) and native-Vietnamese speakers (NVS) to understand differences in authorial presence and rhetorical strategies. Through a comparative analysis of the two corpora, the findings reveal significant variations in the frequency and types of self-mention employed. The findings show that NES writers favour first-person singular pronouns (e.g., ‘I,’ ‘my’) and first-person plural pronouns (e.g., ‘we,’ ‘our’) to assert direct authorial presence, while NVS writers prefer third-person noun phrases (e.g., ‘the researcher’) for a more impersonal tone. NES writers use self-mention for a broader range of rhetorical functions, particularly for explaining a procedure, stating a purpose and stating results, while NVS writers focus on describing procedures, elaborating an argument and stating a purpose with less personal engagement. These patterns suggest cultural and linguistic influences on academic writing, where NES writers adopt a more involved stance, and NVS writers maintain a more formal and objective style. The study concludes that NVS students may benefit from instruction on the strategic use of self-mention to assert greater authorial presence in their writing. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
—
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature
ISSN
25502247
e-ISSN
01285157
Volume of the periodical
31
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
16
Pages from-to
178 - 193
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105009500585