Evaluating the Quality of Benchmark Datasets for Low-Resource Languages: A Case Study on Turkish
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F26%3AYMRTZ8PA" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/26:YMRTZ8PA - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://aclanthology.org/2025.gem-1.41/" target="_blank" >https://aclanthology.org/2025.gem-1.41/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.09714" target="_blank" >10.48550/arXiv.2504.09714</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Evaluating the Quality of Benchmark Datasets for Low-Resource Languages: A Case Study on Turkish
Original language description
The reliance on translated or adapted datasets from English or multilingual resources introduces challenges regarding linguistic and cultural suitability. This study addresses the need for robust and culturally appropriate benchmarks by evaluating the quality of 17 commonly used Turkish benchmark datasets. Using a comprehensive framework that assesses six criteria, both human and LLM-judge annotators provide detailed evaluations to identify dataset strengths and shortcomings. Our results reveal that 70% of the benchmark datasets fail to meet our heuristic quality standards. The correctness of the usage of technical terms is the strongest criterion, but 85% of the criteria are not satisfied in the examined datasets. Although LLM judges demonstrate potential, they are less effective than human annotators, particularly in understanding cultural common sense knowledge and interpreting fluent, unambiguous text. GPT-4o has stronger labeling capabilities for grammatical and technical tasks, while Llama3.3-70B excels at correctness and cultural knowledge evaluation. Our findings emphasize the urgent need for more rigorous quality control in creating and adapting datasets for low-resource languages.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
D - Article in proceedings
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
—
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Article name in the collection
Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Generation, Evaluation and Metrics (GEM^2)
ISBN
979-8-89176-261-9
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Number of pages
17
Pages from-to
471-487
Publisher name
—
Place of publication
—
Event location
Vienna, Austria
Event date
Jan 1, 2026
Type of event by nationality
WRD - Celosvětová akce
UT code for WoS article
—