All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Evaluating the Quality of Benchmark Datasets for Low-Resource Languages: A Case Study on Turkish

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F26%3AYMRTZ8PA" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/26:YMRTZ8PA - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://aclanthology.org/2025.gem-1.41/" target="_blank" >https://aclanthology.org/2025.gem-1.41/</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.09714" target="_blank" >10.48550/arXiv.2504.09714</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Evaluating the Quality of Benchmark Datasets for Low-Resource Languages: A Case Study on Turkish

  • Original language description

    The reliance on translated or adapted datasets from English or multilingual resources introduces challenges regarding linguistic and cultural suitability. This study addresses the need for robust and culturally appropriate benchmarks by evaluating the quality of 17 commonly used Turkish benchmark datasets. Using a comprehensive framework that assesses six criteria, both human and LLM-judge annotators provide detailed evaluations to identify dataset strengths and shortcomings. Our results reveal that 70% of the benchmark datasets fail to meet our heuristic quality standards. The correctness of the usage of technical terms is the strongest criterion, but 85% of the criteria are not satisfied in the examined datasets. Although LLM judges demonstrate potential, they are less effective than human annotators, particularly in understanding cultural common sense knowledge and interpreting fluent, unambiguous text. GPT-4o has stronger labeling capabilities for grammatical and technical tasks, while Llama3.3-70B excels at correctness and cultural knowledge evaluation. Our findings emphasize the urgent need for more rigorous quality control in creating and adapting datasets for low-resource languages.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Generation, Evaluation and Metrics (GEM^2)

  • ISBN

    979-8-89176-261-9

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Number of pages

    17

  • Pages from-to

    471-487

  • Publisher name

  • Place of publication

  • Event location

    Vienna, Austria

  • Event date

    Jan 1, 2026

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article