What matters while assessing quality of social services? Stakeholders' perspective in Czechia
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11410%2F21%3A10428670" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11410/21:10428670 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=IoVMUbJXHU" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=IoVMUbJXHU</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1934411" target="_blank" >10.1080/13691457.2021.1934411</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
What matters while assessing quality of social services? Stakeholders' perspective in Czechia
Original language description
Quality of public services including social services is an issue frequently discussed by policy makers, service providers, and by those who represent service users. The aim of this study was to explore how stakeholders perceive quality of social services, with a particular focus on (1) what did participants rate as important; (2) what is the relative importance of each domain and how does that differ across stakeholder groups and (3) does importance vary by participant characteristics. A specially designed questionnaire was completed by 217 service providers, by 249 public administration representatives and 205 service users of residential care and in-home support. The subjective quality of life of service users was rated as the most important indicator of service quality by all three stakeholder groups. Particularly important were items that related to the nature of the relationships and interactions between staff and service users. There were some differences between stakeholder groups and also by respondent characteristics - public administration respondents, older service users and providers of residential care were more likely to rate health care as more important than other respondents. Implications for how quality is measured are discussed.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50302 - Education, special (to gifted persons, those with learning disabilities)
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/7E13019" target="_blank" >7E13019: Making Persons with Disabilities Full Citizens - New Knowledge for an Inclusive and Sustainable European Social Model</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
European Journal of Social Work [online]
ISSN
1468-2664
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
2021
Issue of the periodical within the volume
5
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
20
Pages from-to
864-883
UT code for WoS article
000658207300001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—