All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

What matters while assessing quality of social services? Stakeholders' perspective in Czechia

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11410%2F21%3A10428670" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11410/21:10428670 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=IoVMUbJXHU" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=IoVMUbJXHU</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1934411" target="_blank" >10.1080/13691457.2021.1934411</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    What matters while assessing quality of social services? Stakeholders' perspective in Czechia

  • Original language description

    Quality of public services including social services is an issue frequently discussed by policy makers, service providers, and by those who represent service users. The aim of this study was to explore how stakeholders perceive quality of social services, with a particular focus on (1) what did participants rate as important; (2) what is the relative importance of each domain and how does that differ across stakeholder groups and (3) does importance vary by participant characteristics. A specially designed questionnaire was completed by 217 service providers, by 249 public administration representatives and 205 service users of residential care and in-home support. The subjective quality of life of service users was rated as the most important indicator of service quality by all three stakeholder groups. Particularly important were items that related to the nature of the relationships and interactions between staff and service users. There were some differences between stakeholder groups and also by respondent characteristics - public administration respondents, older service users and providers of residential care were more likely to rate health care as more important than other respondents. Implications for how quality is measured are discussed.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50302 - Education, special (to gifted persons, those with learning disabilities)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/7E13019" target="_blank" >7E13019: Making Persons with Disabilities Full Citizens - New Knowledge for an Inclusive and Sustainable European Social Model</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    European Journal of Social Work [online]

  • ISSN

    1468-2664

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    2021

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    5

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    20

  • Pages from-to

    864-883

  • UT code for WoS article

    000658207300001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database