All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

What matters while assessing quality of social services? Stakeholders' perspective in Czechia

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18440%2F21%3A50018142" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18440/21:50018142 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/49777513:23420/21:43962508

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13691457.2021.1934411" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13691457.2021.1934411</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1934411" target="_blank" >10.1080/13691457.2021.1934411</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    What matters while assessing quality of social services? Stakeholders' perspective in Czechia

  • Original language description

    Quality of public services including social services is an issue frequentlydiscussed by policy makers, service providers, and by those who representservice users. The aim of this study was to explore how stakeholdersperceive quality of social services, with a particular focus on (1) what didparticipants rate as important; (2) what is the relative importance of eachdomain and how does that differ across stakeholder groups and (3) doesimportance vary by participant characteristics. A specially designedquestionnaire was completed by 217 service providers, by 249 publicadministration representatives and 205 service users of residential careand in-home support. The subjective quality of life of service users wasrated as the most important indicator of service quality by all threestakeholder groups. Particularly important were items that related to thenature of the relationships and interactions between staffand serviceusers. There were some differences between stakeholder groups and alsoby respondent characteristics–public administration respondents, olderservice users and providers of residential care were more likely to ratehealth care as more important than other respondents. Implications forhow quality is measured are discussed

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50403 - Social topics (Women´s and gender studies; Social issues; Family studies; Social work)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2021

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    European journal of social work

  • ISSN

    1369-1457

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    24

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    5

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    20

  • Pages from-to

    864-883

  • UT code for WoS article

    000658207300001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database