Managed ventricular pacing compared with conventional dual-chamber pacing for elective replacement in chronically paced patients: Results of the Prefer for Elective Replacement Managed Ventricular Pacing randomized study

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14110%2F14%3A00079796" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14110/14:00079796 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/65269705:_____/14:00062457
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.03.011" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.03.011</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.03.011" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.03.011</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Managed ventricular pacing compared with conventional dual-chamber pacing for elective replacement in chronically paced patients: Results of the Prefer for Elective Replacement Managed Ventricular Pacing randomized study
Original language description
BACKGROUND Several studies have shown that unnecessary right ventricular pacing has detrimental effects. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether minimization of ventricular pacing as compared with standard dual-chamber pacing (DDD) improves clinical outcomes in patients referred for pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) replacement. METHODS In an international single-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, we compared DDD with managed ventricular pacing (MVP), a pacing mode developedto minimize ventricular pacing by promoting intrinsic atrioventricular conduction. We included patients referred for device replacement with >40% ventricular pacing, no cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrade indication, no permanent atrial fibrillation (AF), and no permanent complete atrioventricular block. Follow-up was for 2 years. The primary end point was cardiovascular hospitalization. The intention-to-treat analysis was performed by using Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
FA - Cardiovascular diseases including cardio-surgery
OECD FORD branch
—

Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year
2014
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)