What would an informant tell me after reading my paper? On theoretical significance of ethical commitment and political transparency
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F12%3A00064321" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/12:00064321 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
What would an informant tell me after reading my paper? On theoretical significance of ethical commitment and political transparency
Original language description
The proposed paper will highlight theoretical significance of fair ethical treatment of informants byway of reflexive analysis of the case of asymmetrical handling of data during my analysis of instructed action. The data for the analysis were assembledduring my ethnographic research of the dance improvisation project. Reading my own conference presentation based on these data I started to question myself what would one of my informants tell me after reading it with me. I was urged to ask this questionespecially in case of this particular informant thanks to my previous experience with making her angry by asking her some questions I needed to confront her with in order to test some of my provisional interpretations of what is going on in the field. By asking the question: what she might tell me? I realised that the way I am treating her in the analysis is not completely fair and started to search for reasons why it is so.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
O - Miscellaneous
CEP classification
AA - Philosophy and religion
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Others
Publication year
2012
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů