Three Concepts of Liberty
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25210%2F21%3A39917811" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25210/21:39917811 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/02261311filozofia.2020.76.2.3.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/02261311filozofia.2020.76.2.3.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2020.76.2.3" target="_blank" >10.31577/filozofia.2020.76.2.3</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
čeština
Original language name
Trojí pojetí svobody
Original language description
Berlin's division of liberty into its positive and negative variants is usually mentioned as a point of reference in the debates about freedom. However, I consider as more fundamental the difference between liberal freedom and freedom based on responsible relations with other people and the surrounding world. In other words, I question the meaning of freedom, which - with a reference to the conception of Ladislav Hejclanek, proponent of the Czech practical philosophy I do not consider to be an elimination of various life bonds, but instead their acceptance, fulfilment, or improvement. However, such binding freedom can also find its ""allies"" in liberalism namely in the so-called liberalism of fear (B. Williams, J. Shklar), which is surprisingly close to Hejdanek's conception and represents at least one of the contemporary currents of liberalism, able to unite with a seemingly opposing tradition. In addition to introducing Hejdanek's conception of freedom, the aim of the paper is also to outline this connection.
Czech name
Trojí pojetí svobody
Czech description
Berlin's division of liberty into its positive and negative variants is usually mentioned as a point of reference in the debates about freedom. However, I consider as more fundamental the difference between liberal freedom and freedom based on responsible relations with other people and the surrounding world. In other words, I question the meaning of freedom, which - with a reference to the conception of Ladislav Hejclanek, proponent of the Czech practical philosophy I do not consider to be an elimination of various life bonds, but instead their acceptance, fulfilment, or improvement. However, such binding freedom can also find its ""allies"" in liberalism namely in the so-called liberalism of fear (B. Williams, J. Shklar), which is surprisingly close to Hejdanek's conception and represents at least one of the contemporary currents of liberalism, able to unite with a seemingly opposing tradition. In addition to introducing Hejdanek's conception of freedom, the aim of the paper is also to outline this connection.
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/EF15_003%2F0000425" target="_blank" >EF15_003/0000425: Centre for Ethics</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Filozofia
ISSN
0046-385X
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
76
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
SK - SLOVAKIA
Number of pages
15
Pages from-to
110-124
UT code for WoS article
000627455300004
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85105284507